Address: office 1410a, 17 Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny, Arkhangelsk, 163002, Russian Federation, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Phone: (818-2) 21-61-21
E-mail: vestnik_est@narfu.ru
http://aer.narfu.ru/en/

ABOUT

Taxonomic Analysis of Pine Forests Coenoflora (Arkhangelsk Region). P. 47–55

Версия для печати

Section: Biology

UDC

581.93

Authors

Burova Natalya Viktorovna
Institute of Natural Sciences and Biomedicine, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov (Arkhangelsk, Russia)
e-mail: natalyaglasova@yandex.ru

Abstract

The paper presents a taxonomic analysis of spruce forests coenoflora of the Arkhangelsk Region, conducted using the methods of comparative floristics. The author studied both natural spruce forests and those transformed by logging and human recreation. 410 geobotanical descriptions were given and dozens of routes were developed. The author revealed 311 species of vascular plants of 188 genera and 61 family. Top ten families include 165 species (55.0 % of the total number of native species) and 88 genera (49.2 % of the total number). The taxonomic spectrum of the coenoflora is dominated by Poaceae, Cyperaceae and Asteraceae families. Most of the species are of Carex, Salix and Equisetum genera. Adventive flora is presented by 11 species, or 3.5 % of the spruce forests coenoflora. The greatest number of adventive genera and species are of Asteraceae and Caryophyllaceae families. Among the coenoflora the author identified 11 species of vascular plants listed in the Red Book of the Arkhangelsk Region. The spruce forests coenoflora is of boreal type and bears no significant traces of anthropogenic transformation.

Keywords

coenoflora, taxonomic analysis, floristic diversity, spruce of the Arkhangelsk Region
Download (pdf, 2.7MB )

References

  1. Antipina G.S. Urbanoflora Karelii [The Urban Flora of Karelia]. Petrozavodsk, 2002. 200 p.
  2. Baranova O.G. Ispol’zovanie razlichnykh vidov analiza pri sravnitel’nom izuchenii flor [The Use of Different Types of Analysis for the Comparative Study of Florae]. Fundamental’nye i prikladnye problemy botaniki v nachale XXI veka. Ch. 4. Sravnitel’naya floristika [Fundamental and Applied Issues of Botany in the Early 21st Century. Part 4. Comparative Floristics]. Petrozavodsk, 2008, pp. 9–12.
  3. Burova N.V., Torbik D.N., Feklistov P.A. Izmenenie floristicheskogo raznoobraziya posle vyborochnykh rubok v el’nikakh chernichnykh [Changes in Floristic Diversity After Selective Cutting in Bilberry Spruce Forests]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoy vestnik, 2010, no. 5 (74), pp. 49–51.
  4. Bushueva M.B., Burova N.V. Floristicheskie osobennosti el’nikov yugo-vostoka Arkhangel’skoy oblasti [Floristic Characteristics of Spruce Forests in the Southeast of the Arkhangelsk Region]. Aktual’nye problemy biologii i ekologii: materialy dokl. XVIII Vseros. molodezh. nauch. konf. [Topical Issues of Biology and Ecology: Proc. 18th All-Russian Youth Sci. Conf.]. Syktyvkar, 2011, pp. 6–8.
  5. Vasilevich V.I. El’niki chernichnye Evropeyskoy Rossii [Bilberry Spruce Forests in European Russia]. Botancheskiy zhurnal, 2004, vol. 89, no. 11, pp. 1728–1739.
  6. Vasilevich V.I. Travyanye el’niki Evropeyskoy Rossii [Herb Spruce Forests in European Russia]. Botancheskiy zhurnal, 2004, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 13–27.
  7. Vasilevich V.I., Bibikova T.V. El’nik kostyanichno-veynikovyy (Calamagrosti arundinaceae-Piceetum) v Evropeyskoy Rossii [Reed Grass Spruce Forest (Calamagrosti arundinaceae-Piceetum) in European Russia]. Botancheskiy zhurnal, 2003, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 55–65.
  8. Vasilevich V.I., Bibikova T.V. El’niki kislichnye Evropeyskoy Rossii [Wood Sorrel Spruce Forests in European Russia]. Botancheskiy zhurnal, 2004, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1573–1587.
  9. Vasilevich V.I., Bibikova T.V. Sfagnovye el’niki Evropeyskoy Rossii [Sphagnum-Spruce Forests in European Russia]. Botancheskiy zhurnal, 2004, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 734–748.
  10. Gusev I.I. Produktivnost’ el’nikov Severa [Productivity of Spruce Forests of the North]. Leningrad, 1987. 232 p.
  11. Gnatyuk E.P., Kryshen’ A.M. Metody issledovaniya tsenoflor (na primere rastitel’nykh soobshchestv vyrubok Karelii) [Methods for Investigating Coenofloras (Example of Plant Communities in Harvested Forest Areas in Karelia)]. Petrozavodsk, 2005. 68 р.
  12. Dyrenkov S.A. Struktura i dinamika taezhnykh el’nikov [Structure and Dynamics of Boreal Spruce Forests]. Leningrad, 1984. 174 p.
  13. sachenko T.I. Severoevropeyskie elovye lesa [Spruce Forests of the European North]. Rastitel’nost’ evropeyskoy chasti SSSR [Vegetation of the European Part of the USSR]. Leningrad, 1980, pp. 82– 98.
  14. Isachenko T.I., Lavrenko E.M. Botaniko-geograficheskoe rayonirovanie [Botanical and Geographical Zoning]. Rastitel’nost’ evropeyskoy chasti SSSR [Vegetation of the European Part of the USSR]. Leningrad, 1980, pp. 10–20.
  15. Kekisheva Yu.E. Raznoobrazie soobshchestv elovykh lesov zapadnoy chasti podzony sredney taygi Arkhangel’skoy oblasti: avtoref. dis. … kand. biol. nauk [Diversity of Spruce Forests in the West of the Middle Taiga Subzone of the Arkhangelsk Region: Cand. Biol. Sci. Diss. Abs.]. St. Petersburg, 2010. 23 p.
  16. Krasnaya kniga Arkhangel’skoy oblasti [The Red Book of the Arkhangelsk Region]. Arkhangelsk, 2008. 351 p.
  17. Krasnaya kniga RF (rasteniya i griby) [The Red Book of the Russian Federation (Plants and Mushrooms)]. Moscow, 2008. 855 p.
  18. Kucherov I.B., Razumovskaya A.V., Churakova E.Yu. Elovye lesa natsional’nogo parka “Kenozerskiy” (Arkhangel’skaya oblast’) [Spruce Forests of the Kenozersky National Park (Arkhangelsk Region)]. Botanicheskiy zhurnal, 2010, vol. 95, no. 9, pp. 1268–1301.
  19. Razumovskaya A.V., Kucherov I.B., Puchnina L.V. Sosudistye rasteniya natsional’nogo parka “Kenozerskiy” (annotirovannyy spisok vidov) [Vascular Plants of Kenozero National Park (Annotated Species List)]. Severodvinsk, 2012. 162 p.
  20. Saburov D.N. Lesa Pinegi [The Forests of Pinega]. Leningrad, 1972. 173 p.
  21. Tolmachev A.I. Vvedenie v geografiyu rasteniy [Introduction to Plant Geography]. Leningrad, 1974. 224 p.
  22. Tolmachev A.I. Metody sravnitel’noy floristiki i problemy florogeneza [Methods of Comparative Floristics and Issues of Florogenesis]. Novosibirsk, 1986. 196 p.
  23. Tolmachev A.I. O nekotorykh kolichestvennykh sootnosheniyakh vo florakh zemnogo shara [On Some Quantitative Relationships in the World Florae]. Leningrad, 1970, iss. 3, no. 15, pp. 62–74.
  24. Torbik D.N. Izmenenie ekologicheskikh faktorov v svyazi s rubkami ukhoda i ikh vliyanie na formirovanie nasazhdeniy: dis. … kand. s.-kh. nauk [Changes in the Environmental Factors Due to Thinning and Their Influence on the Formation of Plantations: Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss.]. Arkhangelsk, 2010.
  25. Tuganaev V.V., Puzyrev A.N. Gemerofity Vyatsko-Kamskogo mezhdurech’ya [Cultivated Plants of the Vyatka and Kama Rivers Interstream Area]. Sverdlovsk, 1988. 128 p.
  26. Cherepanov S.K. Sosudistye rasteniya Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv (v predelakh byvshego SSSR) [Vascular Pants of Russia and Neighbouring Countries (Within the Former USSR)]. St. Petersburg, 1995. 990 p.
  27. Chertovskoy V.G. Elovye lesa Evropeyskoy chasti SSSR [Spruce Forests of the European Part of the USSR]. Moscow, 1978. 176 p.
  28. Shmidt V.M. Statisticheskie metody v sravnitel’noy floristike [Statistical Methods in Comparative Floristics]. Leningrad, 1980. 176 p.
  29. Shmidt V.M. Flora Arkhangel’skoy oblasti [Flora of the Arkhangelsk Region]. St. Petersburg, 2005. 346 p.
  30. Yurtsev B.A., Kamelin R.V. Osnovnye ponyatiya i terminy floristiki [Basic Notions and Terms of Floristics]. Perm, 1991. 80 p.
  31. Yurtsev B.A., Kamelin R.V. Ocherk sistemy osnovnykh ponyatiy floristiki [Article on the Basic Concepts of Floristics]. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie problemy sravnitel’noy floristiki [Theoretical and Methodological Issues of Comparative Floristics]. Leningrad, 1987, pp. 242–266
.