Founder: Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

Editorial office address: Russian Federation, 163002, Arkhangelsk, Naberezhnaya Severnoy Dviny 17, office 1410a

Phone: (818-2) 21-61-00(15-33)
e-mail: l.zhgileva@narfu.ru
http://aer.narfu.ru/en/

16+

ABOUT

The contribution of the seismic station “Severnaya Zemlya” to the study of arctic seismicity. P. 139–145

Версия для печати

Section: Geosciences

UDC

550.34

DOI

10.3897/issn2541-8416.2019.19.4.139

Authors

AP Turova1, ER Morozova1
1 N. Laverov Federal Centre for Integrated Arctic Research (Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation)
Corresponding author: Alyona Turova (turova_ap@fciarctic.ru)

Abstract

At present, a relevant task consists in understanding the seismicity of the European Arctic sector in general and the Barents-Kara region in particular. Due to the small number of seismic stations installed in the Arctic region our understanding of the seismicity of the Arctic is still not properly investigated. However, as a consequence of the operationalisation of the seismic station SVZ Severnaya Zemlya on the Severnaya Zemlya archipelago since 2016, it has become possible to record and process an increased number of seismic events. Data from the Arkhangelsk seismic network were compared with a map of the spatial distribution of earthquake epicentres in the Barents-Kara region and adjacent waters for 2017–2018 created by various seismological agencies. The distribution of the number of earthquakes by magnitude and location registered by the Arkhangelsk seismic network for 2012–2018 are presented. The greatest number of earthquakes is associated with the Gakkel, Knipovich and Mohn Ridges, while the lowest number is associated with the St. Anne trough We compared the number of earthquakes recorded by the Arkhangelsk seismic network in 2017–2018 with those recorded by the Severnaya Zemlya station in the same period. The increased number of recorded earthquakes indicates the importance of opening the Severnaya Zemlya station in Arctic region. The microseismic background level was considered and charts drawn up comparing the daily power spectra of SVZ for the “best” and the “worst” months in terms of seismogram quality. Using an earthquake recorded in the eastern part of the Gakkel ridge as an example, the effective processing of the earthquake record in the WSG software package including the operation of the new SVZ station is demonstrated.
Citation: Turova AP, Morozova ER (2019) The contribution of the seismic station “Severnaya Zemlya” to the study of arctic seismicity. Arctic Environmental Research 19(4): 139–145. https://doi.org/10.3897/issn2541-8416.2019.19.4.139

Keywords

Severnaya Zemlya archipelago, seismic station, earthquakes
Download (pdf, 1MB )

References

  1. Antonovskaya GN (2018) Seismic monitoring of the state of anthropogenic objects and territories of their location, including the Far North. The dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences, 103–104.
  2. Antonovskaya GN, Kapustyan NK, Konechnaya YaV, Danilov AV (2019) Registration capabilities of island Russian seismic stations on the example of monitoring the Gakkel ridge. Seismic instruments 55(2): 48–64.
  3. Antonovskaya GN, Kovalev SM, Konechnaya YaV, Smirnov VN, Danilov AV (2018) New information on the seismicity of the Russian Arctic according to the Severnaya Zemlya seismic observation point. Arctic and Antarctic Research [Problemy Arktiki i Antarktiki] 64(2): 170–181. https://doi. org/10.30758/0555-2648-2018-64-2-170-181
  4. Antonovskaya GN, Kovalev SM, Konechnaya YaV, Smirnov VN, Danilov AV (2017) Point of temporary seismic observations on the arch. Severnaya Zemlya. In: Malovichko AA (Ed.) Modern methods for processing and interpretation of seismological data. Materials of 12th International Seismological School. Obninsk: FITS EGS RAS, 24–28.
  5. Antonovskaya GN, Rogozhin EA, Kapustyan NK, Konechnaya YaV, Fedorenko IV (2017) Tasks and prospects for the development of seismic observations in the Arctic. In: Malovichko AA (Ed.) Development of seismological and geophysical monitoring systems for natural and technogenic processes in Northern Eurasia. Materials of an International Conference dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the opening of the Central Geophysical Observatory in Obninsk. Obninsk: FIC EGS RAS, 9 pp.
  6. Arkhangelsk Seismic Network (2019) Unique Scientific Installation “Arkhangelsk seismic network” http://fciarctic.ru/index. php?page=geoss [Electronic resource; accessed June 19, 2019]
  7. International Seismological Centre (2019) International Seismological Centre. http://www.isc.ac.uk/ [Electronic resource; accessed 19.06.2019]
  8. Konechnaya YaV, Ivanova EV, Shakhova EV (2013) Fundamentals of the theory and practice of processing digital seismic records: Guide for the processing of teleseismic earthquakes on the records of stations of the Arkhangelsk network. Ekaterinburg: RIO UB RAS, 29 pp.
  9. Morozov AN, Vaganova NV, Ivanova EV, Konechnaya YaV, Fedorenko IV, Mikhailova YM (2015) New data on the weak seismicity of the Gakkel ridge. In: Malovichko AA (Ed.) Modern methods of processing and interpretation of seismological data. Materials of the 10th International Seismological School. Obninsk, GS RAS, 230–233.
  10. Peterson J (1993) Observation and modeling of seismic background noise. Open-File Report, 93–322. https://doi. org/10.3133/ofr93322
  11. Yudakhin FN, Morozov AN, Konechnaya YaV (2012 ) Possibilities of the Arkhangelsk Seismic Network for monitoring the Arctic Region. Geophysical Research 13(3): 74–84.